The sensitive information people possess is often difficult to solicit. Attempting gather it without providing any value in return makes the task even harder to accomplish.
You’ll need to make some decisions as you try to pull needed information from those you’re speaking with. One decision will include weighing being forward against being subtle in your approaches.
Subtle vs Forward Approaches of Soliciting Information
Subtlety will seem to be burdensome as a method of soliciting the information you’re trying to attain. Being subtle in your line of questioning may lead to misunderstandings, and typically takes longer to bring about results. Subtle inquiries into the topics you care to know about offer no guarantees.
Straightforwardness on the other hand, typically involves a clear ending to your inquiry. You guarantee yourself to have a clear answer by being forward with those whom you ask for sensitive information from. A clear answer in this regard though, doesn’t mean a clear answer in accordance to what you want to hear.
There is a higher chance that a response to your direct inquiry will be a rejection, as your bluntness in asking can be used as an excuse to bluntly reject. When directly inquiring into certain topics you serve to entrap them. You’ll leave less room for people to politely squeeze themselves out of being willing to answer the questions that we ask.
Below, are ways of combining blunt and subtle approaches of soliciting information by using the concept of reciprocity in a novel way.
The approach below will involve bargaining with your own sensitive information. The aim in doing so will be to motivate those you speak with to reciprocate with their own.
The act of indebting will be the subtle foundation to your interaction which sets the tone. Exposing your own information will allow you to directly inquire into others’ knowledge.
This article is about placing those you speak with into a sort of conversational debt. Doing so will entice them to unveil information they otherwise wouldn’t have.
The information presented below is divided into two major sections:
The process of indebting people with your own information.
The process of soliciting information you seek from them.
Assuming the Risk of Disclosure the Right Way
Banks justify charging interest on the loans they give out by citing the risk they adopt in lending those sums of money out. They take on a sufficient amount of risk in an effort to make a profit on the principal amount they lend out.
Think of the information you aim to indebt your target with as the principal loan. In attempting to barter your own information to get something in return, you will assume the risk of not getting anything back in for it.
Be okay with the fact that the information you will try indebting your target with may not be paid back in full.
There will be ways to protect yourself from the risk you assume in voluntarily giving out some of your information first.
Focusing on maintaining any competitive advantage is an obvious mitigation tactic. Do not give out information which can place you at a competitive disadvantage if nothing is returned from their end.
Imagine yourself seeking to understand how your colleagues format their resume. On the quest to get interview callbacks, there will be pieces of information you can indebt them with. You can voluntarily expose the formatting style of your own resume. Mention which sections come first, which sections are bolded, what you underline, and where you place the dates.
As you do that, you can then inquire into how they format theirs. That topic of discourse will be a low risk activity as formatting generally can’t be used against an individual competitively. You’d thereby minimize risk in divulging how you format your resume in an effort to spark a conversation about your target’s resume.
Starting out your indebting process with minimal risk does well to set up a confident build up to sensitive information. As you enjoy a streak of favorable responses from the person you’re indebting with your own information, you can up the ante.
Begin talking about how you word your previous roles’ responsibilities. Mention whether you include a statement of interest at the top of your resume.
The Risk Is Mitigated by Interest From the Other Party
In your attempts to mitigate risks, you’ll attempt to filter down to exposing information which isn’t impactful.
Trying to limit how much of a competitive disadvantage place yourself in can result in making mistakes. A common mistake to make is not electing to divulge information which is interesting to your recipient.
You’ll need to become a master at balancing your competitiveness with their interest in the topic. Often times the most interesting information to others is the type which would place you in a disadvantaged state. Make a continued effort to limit unveiling a weakness that can be exploited.
Below are three pillars of eliciting interest from your recipients.
Ensure that the information you divulge hits on all three of these pointers. Doing so will increase the chances of your recipients being interested in what you have to say.
The information you try to indebt others with should be exclusive. Public knowledge about you simply coming from your mouth isn’t going to be enough to cut it. By unveiling something not a lot of people know, you’ll do well to make those you speak with want to give something back in return.
Exclusivity is a currency which encourages reciprocity. It is akin to receiving an unexpected favor from our friends and wanting to repay them in some way.
A competitive disadvantage and the act of being vulnerable are different things. One can present themselves as vulnerable while at the same time increasing their competitive advantage over the rest.
For instance, a leader who is emotional and empathetic in the face of an individual’s tragedy will do well to earn their followers’ respect. That leader would undoubtedly show the vulnerability of their emotions. They may though, be acting strategically to benefit his / her position in the eyes of the public.
Vulnerability thereby, can, and should, be added into the information you present. You can use your weaknesses strategically without giving yourself a competitive disadvantage.
Your true feelings about the information you aim to indebt others with is a good start.
Personal information does well to exhibit a sense of vulnerability. Expose yourself to be anxious and stressed over a business decision. Provide insight into your rocky relationship with your mother in law.
Akin to the exclusivity, vulnerability makes people want to help in some shape or form. Help on their part can include unveiling information of their own.
A Call for Their Expertise
A call for expertise does well to help you as you voluntarily present information. It encourages your recipient to prove themselves. A prideful sense of self-worth will back the advice they give and intellect they share if you prop them up to be experts in a specified subject.
Make it known that you view your recipient as an authority in the subject at hand. The conversation can be about winning a contract from a reputable firm or purchasing a new car. Either way, label the person you’re talking to feel like a winner in that specified domain.
The process will look like you unveiling information about yourself (vulnerable, exclusive) within the context of a specific topic first. Then, you’d unveil that you view your recipient as an expert in that topic. Once that’s done, you’d be able to ask them specific questions founded on the fact that they’re “experts” in the topics you ask them about.
The Inquiry / Solicitation
Know What You Want to Inquire Into Specifically
You’ll now feel that you’ve indebted the individual you’re speaking with enough to possibly get some information out of them. Not it’ll be time to inquire into what you want to know.
Remember to not ask general questions about the topics you want to know about. If you’ve not thought about what exactly you’d like to borrow from the other person’s wealth of knowledge, you’re not ready to partake in this exercise.
As you share your own information, sprinkle laser guided questions into the dialogue.
Ensure that your questions are clear and specific, without any added commentary.
- Good question: “Did your real estate agent claim the standard 2% or did you work out a better percentage under the table?”
- Bad question: “Did your real estate agent give you a good deal?”
- Good question: “Which sites did you look for RFPs on when you ran your own consultancy?”
- Bad question: “How’d you get access to RFPs from private companies?”
The pairs of questions above are similar in what type of information they solicit. However, extra detail helps with the precision of the answers you receive. By asking general questions, you’ll leave space for general answers.
In the real estate example above, an answer to the general question can simply be, “Yes.” General answers from your counterparts will entice you to go back in and ask a specific question as a follow up. That reentry into the same topic is what you want to avoid.
A more detailed reentry into the same topic will communicate that you hold their potential answer to be important. Red flags will rise from the perspective of those you speak to.
They’d perceive you to be working hard to solicit information out of them rather than nonchalantly asking. Ensure to ask your questions once by infusing them with as much detail as you can the first time.